Nietzsche on the other hand, being positive in thought, views the origin of morality and the words 'good' and 'bad' as a way that aristocrats and nobles has used to indicate their superiority; thus replacing a theory that gives credit to forgetfulness and accident to one which claims that morality was rather something originated by strong people. Not to condemn or praise another, for that would be too negative, Nietzsche preferred that morality be a product of a more positive endeavor, that of pride and action.
Nietzsche then says that morality was transformed and has become a way to condemn and only conditionally praise those abiding by its rules. He criticizes the new form morality has taken - which he calls slave morality in most of his works - as negative, since it calls this evil and otherwise is good (one need only think of the ten commandments starting with "Thou Shall not.") On the other hand, the morality he describes as master morality originated merely to praise those who are being themselves, and precisely for that reason, it condemns out of contempt for that which is opposed to the good.

0 comments:
Post a Comment